Sam Maller | Staff Photographer

Chancellor Nancy Cantor sits in on the University Senate meeting on Wednesday, Oct. 10. Cantor announced in an email on Friday that she will leave Syracuse University when her contract ends in June 2014.

On the Hill

Chancellor Nancy Cantor announces end of tenure when contract ends in June 2014

Published October 12, 2012 at 12:10 pm

Nancy Cantor announced she will step down as Syracuse University chancellor when her contract ends in June 2014 in an email sent to all students Friday morning.

Despite her decision to leave when her contract is up, Cantor said in the email that her work at SU isn’t done.

“There is much work to be done in sustaining our forward momentum as a university engaged with the world—work for us to tackle together in the coming three semesters, and for our next leader thereafter,” Cantor said in the email.

In the email, Cantor spoke at length about the current status of higher education in today’s world. Despite society’s low opinion of higher education, SU is meeting the challenge, Cantor said.

She listed many of SU’s accomplishments, including helping students pay for college, partnering with community colleges, creating successful entrepreneurship programs, working to restore Onondaga Lake and the university’s continued partnership with the Syracuse community as examples of this.

“We have distinguished histories in this difficult work, and we know there is much more yet to be done going forward,” she said. “We don’t shy away from challenge at Syracuse.”

SU has also taken the lead in several areas with projects such as the Connective Corridor and the Cold Case Justice Initiative, a program which investigates crimes from the Civil Rights era, Cantor said. These innovations, could not be accomplished without SU’s “community of experts” or partnerships with other companies, such as JPMorgan Chase & Co. and IBM, she said.

Cantor also discussed the success of the Campaign for Syracuse University, which aimed to raise $1 billion by December 2013. The university reached its goal in September, three months ahead of schedule. Despite the success of this and other programs, Cantor said the university cannot “take our minds off our responsibilities in the near term.”

“It has been a true honor to join with this University community in so many geographies, on campus and beyond, to make a difference in the world,” she said. “I am savoring the opportunities that will surely continue in the remainder of my term as Chancellor.”

In a statement on Friday, Syracuse Mayor Stephanie Miner said she was saddened to hear the news of Cantor’s plans to step down.

“The Chancellor is a visionary leader who has been a strong partner in the Syracuse community,” Miner said in the statement. “It was her ideas and her ability to execute that we were able to create the connective corridor, build the partnership of Say Yes to Education, and envision a new ‘town and gown’ relationship between the university and the City of Syracuse. I thank her for being a friend, a partner, and a leader and I wish her the best in her future endeavors.”

Representative Ann Marie Buerkle released a statement on Friday as well, and said Cantor’s departure from SU will not only be strongly felt at SU but through the community as well.

“She has succeeded in fostering strong ties between the school and this community to the benefit of both,” she said. “Chancellor Cantor made a truly positive impact on our community by carrying the school’s values off the hill and into the greater Syracuse area.”

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_EUM3GBMCKTNCTXYZ4NX5TANHTY Zochin

    Will she be taking Dr. Gross with her?

  • Bostonway

    YES, THIS IS GREAT NEWS! Point 1: It’s about time the quota-queen left. She has done considerable damage to SU (diminished reputation, pushed her diversity-community crap above making SU a better university, compromised admissions by race, left AAU, lower ranking-ratings as a University, etc, etc.). Point 2: SU Trustees CAN’T let minorities / liberals overwhelm the hiring process for a new Chancelor! If they do, we will get another Cantor who will make engineered-diversity (i.e., compromised standards by race) SU’s main mission and purpose. The Board has a chance to do this right by hiring someone who sees higher and consistent educational standards, plus improving SU’s reputation, as first and foremost!

  • Bostonway

    I’m mixed on Gross… has done some good things, but hired GRob and is slick.

  • Mona

    Yes, good riddance, I support Bostonway completely! Go away dragon lady. Take with you your cronies, who have no qualifications. How much money SU paid you to destroy it?

  • SUalum

    Higher education should NEVER be about reputations. It is about
    providing people with the opportunity to receive a college degree,
    especially those who have had the system working against them their
    whole lives. Making a campus more “diverse” does NOT compromise
    educational standards or make an institution less worthy of praise. What
    Chancellor Cantor has done is make higher education more responsible
    for providing an education to anyone who wants it and to take more
    responsibility for the greater community it is a part of. If one was to
    really take an in depth look at how rankings are given, such as U.S.
    News, then they would see that there is no substance to how those
    rankings are given. As a PROUD alumna of S.U. I have never felt that my
    university has been damaged. The first and foremost responsibility of
    any institution of higher education should be to provide its students
    with the best education and experience and that is exactly what
    Chancellor Cantor has been striving for and succeeding at. Only the
    ignorant would think otherwise…

  • Bostonway

    Gee, for some reason I thought SU might be a better university by… getting only the best students to attend, is race blind, has consistent and increasing admission standards (vs falling to pull in weaker minorities…I worked for SU, I saw the VERY different SAT and GPA stats based on race), hires the best qualifed staff (vs horrible SA diversity hires), looks for balanced political view points, doesn’t protect certain extreme prof’s like Boyce Watkins, focuses more on university improvement (and less on rainbow community efforts), rises in the rankings (regardless if agreed with or not), stops pretending diversity makes an accounting or stats class better (please supply proof?). Nahhh, I must be wrong. Let’s waterdown standards, anyone can attend, keep giving preferences based on race, only support one political viewpoint, give free rides, and make everyone a winner (aka mediocre).. That will certainly make SU a stronger university. And I am the ignorant one…? I suggest you apply to the University of Cuba.

  • TandemSolvo

    I love your response and completely agree with you as I am a recent alumna of SU.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Brown/508342691 Tom Brown

    It would be interesting to know how much tuition has gone up during that 10 year period, versus the national inflation rate. It is fine for the chancellor to pursue “diversity,” but let’s not forget economic diversity. The skyrocketing tuition means, very frankly, that a lot of middle-income students cannot realistically consider SU. My field is journalism and I am grateful for my Newhouse degree. But with the depressed economic state of print journalism, I cannot counsel high school students to take on a $50,000 loan or higher to attend Newhouse. I hope the next chancellor is more cost-conscious and equipped to deal with a federal govt that is going to be leaner and meaner, no matter who is elected president.

  • nyknicks19

    Look no further than the quality of companies that actively recruit from SU (as well as the types of positions)….this simply is not a competitive school in fields other than television, radio, and film….quite a joke actually. I don’t even care to count how many people I know from Whitman who have spent four years (of time and money), to take a job in sales. The only reason I am successful is because of all of my own efforts (I’ll leave the school’s incompetent career services department alone)…I am one year out of school and will never donate to the university…I will not let my children even dream of applying here unless these problems of decreasing quality and skyrocketing admissions are reversed..the reputation is pathetic, as evidenced by the many recruiters that I worked with during my time prior to finding a job on my own…quite frankly I am embarassed to say I went here.
    ….and by the way, going to some of my classes was flat-out ridiculous, the quality of students I shared some classrooms with was an insult to me and the other smart students….the quality of education was sufficiently diluted for the purposes of increasing racial diversity, and in all likelihood profits….and I’ll leave alone the fact that Cantor is one of the highest paid chancellors in the country, while presiding over a school that tumbles in the rankings every year and doesn’t even sniff the top 50 any longer.

Top Stories