Conservative

After one year, Occupy Wall Street accomplishes nothing

Published September 22, 2012 at 12:08 pm
Don't Tread On Me

Occupy Wall Street celebrated its anniversary on Monday. One year ago, Americans took to the streets and exercised their First Amendment right to protest. Utilizing social media and citizen journalism, OWS spread to cities across the nation. The world heard their voices.

And one year later, that’s pretty much all that’s happened.

The OWS movement has incited no changes in politics or policy in the last year, and its momentum is fading. While OWS is not a complete failure, its jumbled message and haphazard organization has made the movement, to quote William Shakespeare, “Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

OWS protesters’ main message is that they are the so-called 99 percent — average Americans who have been “wronged by the corporate forces of the world” — according to their “Declaration of Occupation,” approved last year.

OWS’s list of grievances is so broad and prodigious that meeting its demands would require not reform, but revolution. Protesters occupied Zuccotti Park in Lower Manhattan to condemn the corporations that rule our lives, a corrupt government that offers its consent and an economic system that only guarantees equality of opportunity, not outcome.

Where should we start?

In reality, OWS’s enemy should be a corrupt financial system that favored ruthless control over free market capitalism. This small but powerful group was responsible for the sub-prime mortgage crisis that caused our recent economic meltdown.

Also, OWS’s leaderless groupthink mentality hasn’t helped its cause. Its “human microphone” exercise simply advances the ongoing stereotype that the whole movement boils down to white noise. OWS lacks both a chain of command and a centralized method for communication. Social media crowdsourcing may work to promote a new season of “Pawn Stars,” but not to launch a radical political movement.

Above all, OWS could learn some lessons from a different 99 percent. This 99 percent of Americans share OWS’s deep concern about the economy, unemployment and the shrinking opportunities of the American dream. But instead of blaming corporate corruption or democratic capitalism when their hopes fall short, they double down on hard work and ingenuity. It’s that uniquely American tradition of blue-collar perseverance, no matter the odds.

That tradition helped us win World War II and blaze out of the Great Depression. It sent a man to the moon, won the Cold War, fostered a technology revolution and built a society in which optimism and economic freedom make us the envy of the world.

While this 99 percent wipes their brow and goes back to work, OWS sits, complains and waits.

The parallels between OWS and the Tea Party movement are worth noting. Both built grassroots campaigns in response to policies they deemed unconscionable. But the Tea Party, as flawed as it is, has actually become a political force in our democracy. It has affected public policy. Americans take it seriously.

How many OWS protesters will be elected to Congress in November? Who in the 113th Congress will join the “Occupy Caucus?”

Even Jay-Z — rags to riches music industry millionaire — criticized the movement. “This is free enterprise. This is what America is built on,” he said.

Without any direction, influence or public interest, in just one year, OWS has sunk deep into the shadows of the Manhattan skyline.

It appears Occupy Wall Street got 99 problems, but the 1 percent ain’t one.

Jared Kraham is a senior political science and broadcast journalism major. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at jmkraham@syr.edu and followed on Twitter at @JaredKraham.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kaylenthorpe Kaylen

    There are many points in your article that I would love to argue against, but I’ll focus on the key ones:

    The ’1%’ owns 42% of the national wealth. The bottom 80% of Americans (250 million people) own just 7% of the wealth. The notion of “1 man 1 vote” went out the window a long time ago, and since the Supreme Court recently equated corporate donations to free speech, and the advent of “SuperPACs”, the influence of money in politics is more than ever before. You are disingenuous at best, to argue that this disparity in wealth does not manifest itself in national politics.

    OWS is an outlet for people who feel stiffed by the government and by the ruling corporate elites. Is it ironic that lenders like Chase receive “preferred lender status” on campus – and George W. Bush changed the law so that student loans cannot be discharged in bankruptcy – so that college has become nothing more than a loan factory with guaranteed profits for the banks? Just like “ObamaCare” is guaranteed business for the insurance companies? No! This is absolutely intentional; these companies have made enough campaign contributions and wined and dined enough politicians to convince them that it is in the best interest of the nation – or at least the best interest of their reelection campaign.
    People come to Occupy Wall Street for a variety of reasons – can’t find a job, got laid off… had their tax dollars used to bail out the gamblers on Wall Street, who trashed the economy and ran off with all the money… Wall Street firms gambled with other peoples’ money, and they lost. But they paid for their mistakes with our money.
    Republicans talk about how we need more tax cuts to stimulate the economy. Corporate taxes are at their lowest point ever, and corporate profits are the highest they have ever been. Republicans are really good at convincing their membership to vote against their own interests.

    Conservatives complain about taxation… but the Red States are subsidized by the Blue States! Farm subsidies, public works projects…. For every one dollar that New York State sends to the Federal Government, it receives 79 cents back. For every one dollar that *Mississippi* sends to the Fed, they get back more than $2. http://taxfoundation.org/article/federal-taxing-and-spending-benefit-some-states-leave-others-paying-bill-1 Stop whining about how YOUR money is given to freeloaders. MY money is handed out to backwards states whose policies stifle education and innovation. Oh – cut the farm and oil subsidies too, and let the free market work it’s magic.

    The bankers are striking it rich on the stock market casino with -our- money, and win or lose, they get their cut. If they go bust, we just give them more money to start all over again. You do not make a gambling addict make smarter decisions by giving him more money. Republican/Conservative arguments against banking regulation are self-serving and just plain stupid.

    Throughout history, revolutions have been sparked by extreme inequality of wealth – look at France and Russia. If history shows anything, -anyone- can be assassinated, and -every- government can be overthrown. If things keep going the way they are in this country, the bankers just might find themselves on the wrong side of history.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kaylenthorpe Kaylen

    Let me also add – Mitt Romney will NEVER be president. As he says… I’ll bet $10,000 on it. So, be prepared for another four years of Obama, and then either a Hillary Clinton or an Andrew Cuomo presidency. Dems will hold the White House for the foreseeable future.

Top Stories