The search-committee will be easily hijacked by liberals and minorities. They will push to make ‘diversity and PCness’ the #1 qualification in a candidate, with no push-back because if members do they will be labeled racist. What happens? We get Cantor II… continued watered-down admission standards based on race (vs race blind), a big focus on the ‘underserved’ community (vs improving SU), affirmative-action hiring = liberal / minority hiring (vs hiring the best person for the job), special treatment and higher costs based on race (Office of Multiculturism, Black Homecomings, Latino Clubs, etc), a huge liberal bias on campus (vs balanced speakers and viewpoints), and a falling in the rankings and in reputation. The SU Board must not get caught in this PC spider web, or we repeat the same mistake again! They must hire the person that puts better learning, education, fiscal responsibility, university mgt, equal treatment, and the well being of all students first! Think I’m wrong? Just watch! I predict we get a women or a minority chancellor who will for sure be liberal, and NOT be the best person for the job (i.e., make SU an improved university internally for all and in the eyes of the public).