The Nancy Cantor Files

Alumni community both welcomes, regrets news of Cantor’s 2014 departure

Published October 12, 2012 at 9:06 pm

Chancellor Nancy Cantor’s decision to leave Syracuse University when her contract ends in 2014 was described as a shock by members of the university alumni community, who both welcomed and regretted the news.

SU Alumni Association President Brian Spector, who became active with the alumni community around the same time Cantor joined the university in 2004, said the announcement indicates “the end of a very exciting and great era, especially for alumni.”

“Alumni in the last eight and a half, nine years feel much better about the university because they have a bigger role, they have a bigger part,” Spector said.

He said Cantor has gone out of her way to involve alumni in community initiatives such as the local work through the Connective Corridor and Cold Case Justice Initiative.

Cantor has also expanded the university’s image on a global and national scale, he said. During her time at SU, the university has increased efforts nationally in Los Angeles, Atlanta and Chicago, and globally in Dubai and Istanbul.

As chancellor-elect, Cantor wrote a message to alumni, published in Syracuse University Magazine, about their importance and how she hoped they would continue to interact with their alma mater.

“As alumni, you are one of the University’s most valuable links to the world. You represent a great pool of talent from which we can draw ideas and advice, as well as an intergenerational connection for students now on campus,” she said in the message.

Spector praised the chancellor for meeting conflict head on in a job that’s “not always been easy.” Everything she has done, Spector said she has done with “Nancy style,” with poise, class and a vision of Syracuse as not just an institution, but a way of life.

SU was known primarily for its sports program ten to 15 years ago, said Kim Brown, assistant director for Alumni Programs at SU Career Services and a 2006 alumna.

Today, SU is not only more recognizable on a national scale, but is also respected in the community, thanks to Cantor’s balance between campus and citywide efforts, Brown said.

“She’s a good tenant in the city where she’s been living,” she said.

In the greater alumni community and on Twitter, alumni reaction to the news was split. Some tweeted they were shocked and saddened by the news, while others welcomed the news, using hashtags like “#bringbackbuzzshaw,” referring to Kenneth “Buzz” Shaw, who preceded Cantor as chancellor.

Angelo DiCarlo, who graduated with a degree in broadcast journalism in 2005, said the news of Cantor’s departure means he will begin donating to the university. DiCarlo worked at HillTV between 2001 and 2005, just before Cantor revoked HillTV’s status as a recognized student organization in fall 2005, after repeated airings of offensive content by former entertainment program ‘Over the Hill.’

DiCarlo said he agreed that the program was in the wrong when it aired the content, but disagreed with how Cantor handled the situation and made a promise with other alumni to never donate to SU during Cantor’s tenure.

“I’m sure she did a lot of good things, but I felt there were things she did not do correctly,” DiCarlo said. DiCarlo, who is now a sports anchor at WNDU in South Bend, Ind., said he is now saving up to make a donation to SU in two years.

Other alumni who were students during Cantor’s time reflected on the initiatives Cantor pushed in the city. Many said she will be missed and described her effect on both campus and in the city as “tremendous.”

“I am very excited for her and I am proud to say that I attended SU while she was there,” said Mairead Kiernan, who graduated in May and is now working at Texas Tech University, in an email.

Cantor has not indicated what she will be doing after ending her tenure as SU chancellor. Spector, as well as other alumni, have wished Cantor the best in her future career moves.

  • Bostonway

    One big WELCOME! With the quota-queen leaving, her replacement can focus on making SU a better / stronger university for all students (not just selective groups) and in the eyes of the public. Assuming of course the Trustee’s don’t get caught-up in PCness and a search-committee that is hijacked by lib’s and minorities. What to watch for? > If the search-committee announces that it is looking for a candidate that will ‘advance SU’s top-values such as diversity!’ The outcome? > Cantor II and SU’s reputation keeps falling. Now, before all the lib’s start screaming racist; I want SU to race-blind in admissions, to give equal opportunity (but NO special treatment), to assist with tuition based on economic status only (not racial), to give financial incentives to the best students to come to SU regardless of background, to stop supporting and paying for the Office of Multiculism (aka Office of Blacks and Latinos), get rid of Black Homecoming (do we not have a Homecoming for all alums?) etc, etc.

  • Canada

    Another comment by Prof. Jeff Stonecash

  • http://www.facebook.com/robert.marks3 Robert Marks

    Among Dr. Cantor’s accomplishments, she also presided over the demise of Syracuse as a prestigious academic institution in favor of establishing a university-wide social services agency worshiping at the altar of quotas and diversity. SU has fallen to the second tier in U.S New and World Report’s ranking of American universities. You can argue the score in any given year, but there is a clear downward trend over the past decade. Additionally, Syracuse withdrew from the Association of American Universities (AAU) before it could be unceremoniously booted out for its precipitous drop in Federal research dollars even though the University of Buffalo and University of Rochester are solid members.
    “When it comes to federal research dollars, Syracuse has been on the decline. According to a Chronicle analysis of federal data, from 1999 to 2009, Syracuse had the fifth-largest percentage decrease in federally financed research expenditures of any college that was in the top 200 in federal money in 1999. Syracuse’s federal dollars fell to $22.4-million during that period, a 42-percent drop after adjusting for inflation. Syracuse dropped 74 places—to 194th from 120th—on the list of universities reporting the most federally financed research expenditures.” – The Chronicle of Higher Education (May 2, 2011)

Top Stories